The United Sovereign Nations
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Water Splitting Next "Green" Power Source?

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Water Splitting Next "Green" Power Source? Empty Water Splitting Next "Green" Power Source? Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:03 am

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

A limitless renewable energy source that can wean humans off fossil fuels has existed for billions of years, according to the latest report from a "green" scientist.

The trick to using it is figuring out how to make our power sources more like plants—and a recent discovery may bring scientists closer to the goal. Plants use photosynthesis to capture energy directly from the sun, a feat that humans have been striving to achieve for years via solar cells.

"How will mankind be able to supply itself with the levels of energy it needs?" asked James Barber, a biochemist at Imperial College London.

"Really, there is only one solution … to use the enormous amount of sunlight available to us."

An hour of sunlight falling on Earth equals all the energy that humans use on average in a year. But to date solar cells have been inefficient energy converters—the most efficient plastic solar cells on today's market convert only 6 percent of sunlight into usable energy. Another option is to mimic the chemical reactions in photosynthesis, Barber said, specifically a step known as water splitting. Water splitting is a complex chemical reaction that takes place in leaves, algae, phytoplankton, and other green organisms. Understanding this structure may help scientists replicate the enzyme artificially.

"This is a very difficult chemical problem and nature solved it," said Gary Brudvig, a biophysical chemist at Yale University who has also been researching photosystem II.

"We've first been trying to figure out how nature does the chemistry and—once we've obtained a reasonable idea of how the natural system works—we [will try] to replicate that in artificial systems."

Many of today's carbon-based fuels are currently derived from photosynthesis that took place millions of years ago. That energy is stored in the form of oil, gas, and coal. But, Brudvig said, a more efficient energy solution depends on duplicating natural systems rather than relying on dwindling supplies of fossil fuels.

"If the leaf can do it, we can do it."

This was actually back in '07, but I love this idea. Why are we continuing to clamor over oil when the Earth is already three fourths fuel? Water is the most abundant thing on this Earth and it can solve all our energy problems overnight.

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

Carl

Carl

Hmmm that is a great idea, but as the professor pointed out, the thing is that this is too complex for us.

In the biology class, my teacher said that the energy in living organisms is done through ATP, or adenosine triphosphate, which is significantly different from the things we use now. Unlike burning, which gives off significant amount of heat, which then equals to energy, ATP is a ladder step, which gives off small amounts of energy (and afterwards free energy is stored; usually we use the free energy released)

Water Splitting Next "Green" Power Source? U1CP3-2_SugarOxidation_ksm

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

Just because it's a complex method doesn't mean it shouldn't be done. I fear governments have become too accustomed to familiarity. Progress won't be made if we don't try to do something different. And oil is going to run out sooner than later.

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

Carl

Carl

Well I'm not saying it is impossible and overly complex, but someday we should find a way that can harness more energy Razz

Then a solar storm comes out and destroy our communication stuff Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

In related news, Scientists are getting reinvigorated about replacing Uranium with Thorium as a Nuclear powersource. It's safer, more plentiful, plus it's extremely hard to weaponize. What's not to love?

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum