Case Proposal: Insulo, Shayden, Ruteria, et al. vs. Raelion Cae Magnus

Will the third plaintiff please step up.

It's ok Forthie

Will the plaintiffs please provide either some evidence of these crimes, or summon their first witness.

PS: 15,000th USNW post (discounting deleted posts)

We would like to bring our first evidence, a court case back in 2003 where Raelion Cae had been proven to treat workers inhumanly and was fined a small fee, and in 2009 where it "was the subject of an Amnesty International report into the deterioration of human rights as a consequence of it's activities in the Northern Peilan. In particular, Amnesty criticised the continuation of forced work and inhumane treatment."

500th post

Maybe all the plaintiffs' witnesses first

111222333444 wrote:Maybe all the plaintiffs' witnesses first

The question I asked above will be asked induvidually for each prosecuting witness, so after Raelion Cae provides a witness, evidence, or declines the opportunity, I'll call up the next plaintiff's witness

Eh isn't it witness ---> cross examination ---> another witness before Raelion calls witness?

I would like to call on Usami Nabuto from the Taiji Fishers Association

Usami Nabuto: During my fishing trip in the Katsuran Sea, I noticed something in the ocean. I saw a lot of fish floating in the water. I gathered some of them up in my net and went back to the dock in Harukon. From there, I asked my colleagues to go to the Medical Laboratory for testing. The other fish were thrown in the garbage for cleaning purposes since it can't be used for food. A week later, the lab has found out that the fish has cyanide in it, a chemical used for Gold Mining, and it is very toxic for people and wildlife. Since only Morsco has Gold Mines, the cyanide must have come from Raelion Cae's "Super Pits".

Daniel! What's next?

Sorry D:

Will the plaintiffs please submit further evidence or call up their next witness.

(I hd to opy-pste severl letters or the bove to look proper D: )

Can we have a verdict?

I hereby place this before the jury. All full members, excluding Martin, Kurt, Jon, Carl, Chip, and myself must vote on whether the defendants are "Guilty" or "Not Guilty".

I vote Guilty.

Yeah, do we have enough full members dan? I think ambassadorials should also vote for Guilty or Not Guilty.

We have enough full members who can vote (Fox and Bigro, + Kenny if he returns from on-leave)... and it's against the Charter to allow Ambassadorial Members to vote anyways.