Project Kenway

All I have to say Juls, is that the world is round and this cycle of arguing would not stop and actually causes us to be unproductive, which doesn't help in a fledgling union, a little information wouldn't hurt, instead of a lot of information, information is $censored$ and we would have to painstakingly assess all of them. It will not be known as the age of discovery without a reason you know, and if we start where it is really the start, this is going to be like this:

Making of Adonia (Science subject; should be discussed in a different thread)
Evolution (Science subject; should be discussed in a different thread)
Ancient Civilizations (Western and Central Althenian Nations only)
European Empires (Western Althenian Nations only)
Dark Ages (Western Althenian Nations only)
Renaissance (Western Althenian Nations only)
Age of Discovery/The Enlightenment (everyone had contribution)
Industrial Revolution (everyone had contribution)
Contemporary Period (everyone had contribution)
Now

Now Compare this to Euphemian and Itzamnan Nations:
Tribal History (includes Aborigines, Mayans, etc.)
Discovery, Colonization
Independence
Contemporary Period

East Althenian/Carreon Nations:
Local/Tribal History
Discovery and contact by the West
Colonization
Independence
Contemporary Period

and Neridean Nations:
Local History
Western Contact and Colonization
Scramble for Africa
Independence
Contemporary Period

See? Aside from local history, which can be easily molded (note, I'm not saying to sever parts of history, I am not saying to completely ignore it, but this is, for me, is the origin of modern world history (NOTE:Universities have a separate course where it actually begins here to start, My professor, which is an expert to this stuff, said beginning here would actually make more sense if you are to start a role play, because it is a catalyst for the subsequent ) to fit this puzzle, this is the first thing that comes out with the majority world, which not quite fair when we begin with the Western Althenian Nations, in which we don't have business with, at all.

Also this is getting to the point of flaming, so we should stop.  

http://www.the-map-as-history.com/maps/10-age_of_discovery.php this is quite logical and simple, and this is what we should have in the end.

Chris wrote:I feel like Juls is taking a flame war to Carl

At least it's productive and it does set a path which ones to touch and which ones don't. (Everyone has opinions, ya know)

We did dive in it a little too much with the arguing but I think it's time to start on the simplest ones. So, we should begin with a short synopsis of history of your country before this age (this is your idea Juls)


There is a timeline that Naik made somewhere about the history of the Euphemian continent.

I suggest a Google doc to keep a database.

As for Mitron, it was populated by the Ohcans on Jonota & Osatta Island (collective term, they weren't the exact same tribe) and on the mainland, bounded by mountains, and reaching slightly into Kuyrut, were the Pudgets, a violent group of tribes who basically attacked any not their own.

Good enough?

Well then who is our Christopher Columbus and which country did he come from ???

Insulo maybe?

Technically he was Italian, but the Spaniards were the only ones who would finance and supply him.

I mean who should he be from in Adonia not earth

I would say Cristoforo Colombo came from Matinenda, because it's comparable to Italy and nearby nations have different ones (unless Sinope would want to say aye)

Carl wrote:if we start where it is really the start, this is going to be like this:

Making of Adonia (Science subject; should be discussed in a different thread)
Evolution (Science subject; should be discussed in a different thread)
Ancient Civilizations (Western and Central Althenian Nations only)
European Empires (Western Althenian Nations only)
Dark Ages (Western Althenian Nations only)
Renaissance (Western Althenian Nations only)
Age of Discovery/The Enlightenment (everyone had contribution)
Industrial Revolution (everyone had contribution)
Contemporary Period (everyone had contribution)
Now

Now Compare this to Euphemian and Itzamnan Nations:
Tribal History (includes Aborigines, Mayans, etc.)
Discovery, Colonization
Independence
Contemporary Period

East Althenian/Carreon Nations:
Local/Tribal History
Discovery and contact by the West
Colonization
Independence
Contemporary Period

and Neridean Nations:
Local History
Western Contact and Colonization
Scramble for Africa
Independence
Contemporary Period

This seems like a fair and reasonable match plan to me. I'll go with it Carl (bow)

I don't mind anyone using Sinopian explorers during the Age of Discovery as long as it only involves individuals and not the Republic itself.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SKcEvfy--edjTKI_QGdr_STBD_1oLJAi9gypJYWNSpY/edit?usp=sharing

I started a Google doc, put my ideas in. If someone could put the link in the first post, that might help. For now you can only comment, to prevent people from putting every single idea of theirs into the timeline.

I think we should start with Vasco da Gama and some Insulonian exploration to around Neridea.

Case 1: ([Insulonian] Voyages) before (Vasco da Gama)
Name Proposal: TBA
Funded by: Insulo or a Kingdom on the western shore. Spearheaded by some prince who had tastes in maritime exploration.
Purpose of trip: To perfect the boat known as the caravel. Also to explore the Vassalies and Neridea.

Case 1 Image proposal:

Insulo before Trentannia?

Le Trents seem to have a straighter shot to the Vassalies.

It could be due to economical and political reasons. Even though Trent had the straight route, it is still comprised of small kingdoms

Carl wrote:I would say Cristoforo Colombo came from Matinenda, because it's comparable to  Italy and nearby nations have different ones (unless Sinope would want to say aye)

Good joke.

Regarding the Vassalies, I'd been thinking myself about a colonisation by all of the major powers of the time (Insulo, Trentannia, Bruellen etc.) It would be the first colonisation, the first conflict with natives, diseases and so on. It would be an important moment in the economic, political and military future of the nations involved.

My thoughts.

One of the Bergen countries could have gained a foothold for a bit

I'd been thinking myself about a colonisation by all of the major powers of the time

One of the Bergen countries could have gained a foothold for a bit

While we're at it, lets say everyone had a piece of the pie at least once.

Not everyone can start out big in history. If it were that way then almost every European country would have had a major colony on North America. Can we try to stay a little bit modest with this.

That's why we begin with Vasco da Gama, because there was actually no colonization that took place, and it was a way to perfect the caravel, which will be used in later explorations.

Unless you guys would want to row the entire Dacian Ocean for colonization, that would be more fun.

Mike in all fairness at some point pretty much all European countries did have colonies for a bit so it would be wrong for the majority not have had some action. Then the major nations would have then dominated and taken them all giving the cultures we have today

Well in the history I've written for Sinope, it's already established in my case that Sinope only had a small pie of the whole imperialist colonial agenda around the world and was late to do so. Sinope focused more on its seas than the oceans.

Any contradictions to case 1? Or we could work from there?

I'm fine with it.

Case one is good

Where we at now?

We are at Case 2, which is basically Vasco Da Gama's journey. I'll prepare a map later so watch out for my post.

Thank you, Carl. I shall have to go back and read Case 2 (which probably won't happen since I'm busy right now) but let's hope we can get this thread alive again)