Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT

I was thinking yesterday how badly placed LITHENIANT really is. It is a alto-Slavic nation in a turk area at the moment. It needs to change really, your thoughts before I post an app for it.

P.S. Where LITHENIANT moves Kallvarde is likely to follow

It's up to you.  I don't really know much of the history anyway. Also, the title of this thread is "Proposal of a Proposal..." Not sure why you are proposing to create a proposal.

I am proposing to you lot to see if it was a good idea to move it.

I support not only its move but it's disappearance. It shouldn't have been accepted in the first place tbh, among other things...

We are talking about it being there we are talking about is movement, not removal thankyou very much.

Please have some respect. Arigatou Gozaimas.

Diogenes wrote:I support not only its move but it's disappearance. It shouldn't have been accepted in the first place tbh, among other things...

god bless you

God bless you too

 

Anyway, Agunter, I think we're looking for a proposal from you.  I, too, don't even support its existence, but you did apply with it, and we did accept it.

My question to you, is is it better to move it, or not.

Um, the question is, would you provide more information (maps, etc.), or not?

Yes of cource when I have decided to actually move it. I am still not sure whether to move it or not

I would consider getting rid of it if I were you. For the sake of realism it would be the right thing to do.

Well as I may have pointed out I won't get rid of it, it in rather intergril to both Bergenstein and Kallvaerd history. I will move it I think, more accurate.

Agunter999 wrote:Well as I may have pointed out I won't get rid of it, it in rather intergril to both Bergenstein and Kallvaerd history. I will move it I think, more accurate.

Kallvarde is not even accepted in the union yet, so why bother?

As far as it goes, I can see Litheniant as a non-integral part of your history. I do not see concrete evidence of why it is rather important to your history. Your wiki only mentions Litheniant twice, Litheniant itself is a redlink in the wiki, Litheniant is neutral during the Bergen War, what else? I do not see anything that could possibly be important to yours or to us. The motives into taking this land and calling it "Litheniant" is as clear as mud.

An example of a something important is the small Kuykan Islands. Even though it is pretty small, it is involved in a lot of conflicts and also a lot of trade and economy. There were reasons to be part of Kuyrut's History, such as the unity of the land versus Trentannia as well as an important hopping point during the Great Adonian War. It connects well with other nations' history, such as Trentannia and even Okaiken. It even has interconnected economy, with even competing Airports against Okaiken in the Trans-Cilician Airspace!

Well yes but I am editing Kallvarde as we speak and Lith has a major part in it. Also in some berg wars I have yet to finalise. And I like it

There is just no realistic reason for you to have Litheniant in the first place. It hasn't even been important at all in your RP in the union as of now. Nor your other random dependency near Mervey. I would like to strongly advise you to delete both of these unrealistic dependencies and focus on "Mainland" Bergenstein.

Diogenes wrote:I support not only its move but it's disappearance. It shouldn't have been accepted in the first place tbh, among other things...

Yes, I agree.