The United Sovereign Nations
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Proposal | Unification of Kwangju

+3
Kurt
Willem
Carl
7 posters

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 3]

1Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:55 am

Carl

Carl

Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Flag_of_kwangju



The Imperial Kingdom of Okaiken has a launched a motion before the USNW General Assembly to Recognize the Republic of Kwangju, a union of 3 nations in the Kwangju peninsula including the former USNW Nation Nilia and Albian.




I hope this is good roleplay, with debates and them. Razz



Last edited by ArrowHead on Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:28 pm; edited 2 times in total

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

2Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:06 am

Willem

Willem
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)

Nice flag Wink

3Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:06 am

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

I agree. Also nice flag. Smile

4Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:53 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

Wow very nice! Very Happy I think this may belong in the information or history section of the Adonian Information Center. Razz

I support it.

5Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:29 pm

Carl

Carl

LOL

No objections? Like who will govern the nation or something? Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

6Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:45 pm

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

Elections?

7Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:46 pm

Chris

Chris
Member (Mitron)
Member (Mitron)

Why does it mention Europe?

8Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:01 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

I didn't read the whole thing through, but I assumed I would be okay with it since you wrote it. Razz But yeah, looks like Carl stole a constitution! XD

9Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:06 pm

Carl

Carl

Some parts of it; it's not a constitution either; it's a treaty

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

10Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:30 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

Well, I like it. Razz You may want to fix that though.

11Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:47 am

Carl

Carl

I don't know what to fix. It has been proofread and such Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

12Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Wed Apr 24, 2013 3:52 pm

Jon

Jon
First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)

It's the German Unification Treaty Razz

And you missed a spot Carl:

aware that the inviolability of frontiers and of the territorial integrity and sovereignty of all states in Europe within their frontiers constitutes a fundamental condition for peace,

13Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:44 pm

Carl

Carl

LOL Razz

EDIT: Well, not the entire treaty; there are some parts that I changed, like parts of Article 1 and an addition of Article 11. Also didn't copy the entire treaty and could be revised. But it needs the assembly to debate on what needs to be changed or not Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

14Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:09 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

Please change Europe. Razz

15Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:30 am

Carl

Carl

Changed Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

16Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:14 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

Okay, I think it's ready for vote. Razz

17Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:21 pm

Carl

Carl

We didn't even have enough deliberations for this yet, as I said before, this is only 1/4 of the German treaty; USNW must draft several amendments to the treaty and maybe tweak this up a bit.

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

18Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:25 am

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

So we are supposed to contribute to this? Razz I don't know what to add. D:

19Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:36 am

Carl

Carl

Yes, we are supposed to contribute

You can do like armed forces and how the economy is handled, etc.

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

20Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:15 am

Willem

Willem
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)

What constitution are you making ammendments too? Razz

PS It's my flag Razz

21Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:19 am

Carl

Carl

You have no idea how a draft works? -_-

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

22Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:22 am

Willem

Willem
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)

I realise that. I was pointing out that maybe it should be added. Razz

23Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:20 am

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

Shayden feels that the new country should use the economic system that all countries agree with. It is not Shayden's place to establish rules for a country who's circumstances differ from its own.

(I just did this as an attempt to be anti-imperialist. I would say they should be a Free Market Economy with some Socialism for Healthcare and Education.)

24Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 1:47 pm

Carl

Carl

Okay, I should do mine then. (@Kurt - we are just drafting ideas, pass it to them to supplement it, and they'll decide if they add it)

Okaiken agrees with the following with Shayden, and would communicate with the officials at the three nations.

USNW's economy will be forecasting a slight dip after the reunification and Althenian Nations such as Morsco and Okaiken will be affected to increased interest of shareholders buying out stocks in the reunified nation.

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

25Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Empty Re: Proposal | Unification of Kwangju Sat Apr 27, 2013 3:21 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

ArrowHead wrote:You can do like armed forces and how the economy is handled, etc.
Acadia does not believe that it should have any control over this nation's armed forces, economy, etc. The Acadian Federation will abstain from any control in this treaty and/or consitution.

Lol, I don't think we should be controlling that stuff. I say let the people who live there decide. Razz

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 3]

Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum