The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Tue Nov 05, 2013 12:40 pm

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
I was thinking yesterday how badly placed LITHENIANT really is. It is a alto-Slavic nation in a turk area at the moment. It needs to change really, your thoughts before I post an app for it.

P.S. Where LITHENIANT moves Kallvarde is likely to follow

View user profile

2 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:19 pm

Jack

avatar
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
It's up to you. Razz I don't really know much of the history anyway. Also, the title of this thread is "Proposal of a Proposal..." Not sure why you are proposing to create a proposal. Wink


_________________
"My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
View user profile

3 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Tue Nov 05, 2013 5:48 pm

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
I am proposing to you lot to see if it was a good idea to move it.

View user profile

4 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:32 am

Juls

avatar
Member (Sinope)
Member (Sinope)
I support not only its move but it's disappearance. It shouldn't have been accepted in the first place tbh, among other things... Cross

View user profile

5 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Wed Nov 06, 2013 3:44 am

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
We are talking about it being there we are talking about is movement, not removal thankyou very much.

View user profile

6 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:39 pm

Please have some respect. Arigatou Gozaimas. Neutral

View user profile http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

7 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:15 pm

alerules22

avatar
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Diogenes wrote:I support not only its move but it's disappearance. It shouldn't have been accepted in the first place tbh, among other things... Cross
god bless you

View user profile http://www.usnw.net

8 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:36 am

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
God bless you too

View user profile

9 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Thu Nov 07, 2013 6:02 pm

Jack

avatar
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
scratch 

Anyway, Agunter, I think we're looking for a proposal from you. Razz I, too, don't even support its existence, but you did apply with it, and we did accept it.


_________________
"My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
View user profile

10 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Thu Nov 07, 2013 6:27 pm

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
My question to you, is is it better to move it, or not.

View user profile

11 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:53 pm

Um, the question is, would you provide more information (maps, etc.), or not? Neutral

View user profile http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

12 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:31 am

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Yes of cource when I have decided to actually move it. I am still not sure whether to move it or not

View user profile

13 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:37 am

Kurt

avatar
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)
I would consider getting rid of it if I were you. For the sake of realism it would be the right thing to do.

View user profile

14 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Fri Nov 08, 2013 12:10 pm

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Well as I may have pointed out I won't get rid of it, it in rather intergril to both Bergenstein and Kallvaerd history. I will move it I think, more accurate.

View user profile

15 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:05 pm

Agunter999 wrote:Well as I may have pointed out I won't get rid of it, it in rather intergril to both Bergenstein and Kallvaerd history. I will move it I think, more accurate.
Kallvarde is not even accepted in the union yet, so why bother? Neutral

As far as it goes, I can see Litheniant as a non-integral part of your history. I do not see concrete evidence of why it is rather important to your history. Your wiki only mentions Litheniant twice, Litheniant itself is a redlink in the wiki, Litheniant is neutral during the Bergen War, what else? I do not see anything that could possibly be important to yours or to us. The motives into taking this land and calling it "Litheniant" is as clear as mud. Neutral

An example of a something important is the small Kuykan Islands. Even though it is pretty small, it is involved in a lot of conflicts and also a lot of trade and economy. There were reasons to be part of Kuyrut's History, such as the unity of the land versus Trentannia as well as an important hopping point during the Great Adonian War. It connects well with other nations' history, such as Trentannia and even Okaiken. It even has interconnected economy, with even competing Airports against Okaiken in the Trans-Cilician Airspace!

View user profile http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

16 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Fri Nov 08, 2013 1:16 pm

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Well yes but I am editing Kallvarde as we speak and Lith has a major part in it. Also in some berg wars I have yet to finalise. And I like it Razz

View user profile

17 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Fri Nov 08, 2013 5:27 pm

Juls

avatar
Member (Sinope)
Member (Sinope)
There is just no realistic reason for you to have Litheniant in the first place. It hasn't even been important at all in your RP in the union as of now. Nor your other random dependency near Mervey. I would like to strongly advise you to delete both of these unrealistic dependencies and focus on "Mainland" Bergenstein.

View user profile

18 Re: Proposal of a Proposal to move LITHENIANT on Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:15 am

Willem

avatar
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)
Diogenes wrote:I support not only its move but it's disappearance. It shouldn't have been accepted in the first place tbh, among other things... Cross
Yes, I agree.

View user profile

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum