The United Sovereign Nations
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna

+5
Agunter999
Kurt
Scotch Moen
Juls
alerules22
9 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:20 pm

alerules22

alerules22
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)

Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Newitzamna

I've created the following map due to the current unrealism of Itzamna.

No changes;
Pataglia (Republiek Patageli); No important or unrealistic issues.
Monterosa (República de Monterrosa); No important or unrealistic issues. Independence from Uruna in 1862.
Hamaguay (Republica del Hamaguay); No important or unrealistic issues.

Minor changes;
Uruna (República de Uruna); Western Northernmost border added from Ruteria due to aesthetical and more historically and geographically pleasing borders.
Sucrestia (República Fenorana de Sucrestía); Added the territory of Nastara due to more historically feasible territory and realism on the area.

Major Changes;
Samasil (República Federativa do Samãsil); Greatly expanded the territory due to it's importance in Itzamna as a superpower and major economic power.
Balisca (República Baliscana); Decreased area for Pazala, thorough changes in the San Santa María Islands, addition of the Baliscan Arktic Territory.
Pazala (República de Pazala); Addition of territory for more historically accurate and aesthetically pleasing borders, taken into account the geography of the area, addition of the Pazalan Arktic Territory.
Reintana (Republik Reintana); Greatly decreased area due to historical issues, Brullan colony now feasible, division of the area for new countries.

New Changes;
Cusco (República del Cusco); Added because of the presence of important cultures for Itzamna; most importantly the Enko. Aesthetically pleasing and helps the realistic feel of the area.
Alcadiz (República del Alcádiz); Added for a more thorough realism feel and the presence of rebellion in the area since Insulonian colonization.
Borona (Co-operative Republic of Borona); Added due to Trentannian influence in the area, tension and border irregularities between Valverde and the country, ROLEPLAY.
Valverde (Estado Plurinacional del Valverde); Added for geopolitically feasible realism, ROLEPLAY in the area, tensions with Borona.
Doraguay (República del Doraguay); Added for geopolitcally and aesthetically pleasing borders, more realism in the area.
Guraquil (República de Guraquil); Geopolitics, was part of the Insulonian Viceroyalty of Gran Chacao.
Chacao (República de Chacao); Geopolitics, was part of the Insulonian Viceroyalty of Gran Chacao.
Cajica (República de Cajica); Geopolitics, was part of the Insulonian Viceroyalty of Gran Chacao.

Please comment your comments about this proposal and please comment if you agree or disagree with it.

http://www.usnw.net

2Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:22 pm

Juls

Juls
Member (Sinope)
Member (Sinope)

One agrees.

3Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:38 pm

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

Two agrees.

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

4Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:31 am

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

Pazala makes Itzamna look a lot more like South America, otherwise I have no disagreements.

5Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:16 am

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

You're the third one to notice/mention "Chile". Razz

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

6Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:47 am

alerules22

alerules22
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)

Yeah but without it Balisca looks too big, and it would probably cause it to be more powerful and I think this helps the area to be balanced and to stabilize the powers, equalizing it and allowing the nations to be more realistic, it could even create rolepay between the borders as Balisca could claim parts of Pazala. Smile

http://www.usnw.net

7Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:09 pm

Agunter999


Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)
Member (Bergenstein & Kallvarde)

That sounds quite interesting actually, I was unsure about Pazala actually

8Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:03 pm

alerules22

alerules22
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)

Thank you, I am glad you find it interesting

http://www.usnw.net

9Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:35 pm

Carl

Carl

Interesting, I agree.

Looking at Satellite maps, I guess, let it go? Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

10Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:11 pm

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

I guess it'll work, but I am still meh on the "Chile".

11Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 5:59 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

I agree with the change. Very realistic, Agus. Smile Thank you for making this.

12Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:32 pm

Jon

Jon
First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)

I don't see any problems with this.

I support these changes.

13Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 18, 2013 6:33 pm

alerules22

alerules22
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)

Thank you guys for the support!

http://www.usnw.net

14Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:48 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

Let's vote. Razz

I say yes.

15Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Thu Nov 21, 2013 12:14 am

Carl

Carl

Yes for me Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

16Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:55 pm

Juls

Juls
Member (Sinope)
Member (Sinope)

YES.

17Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:00 am

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

Yes

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

18Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Fri Nov 22, 2013 12:06 am

Willem

Willem
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)

Yes, I get my colony, yay! Razz

Although, it pays a striking resemblance...

19Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Sun Nov 24, 2013 3:08 pm

alerules22

alerules22
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)

Is this done with voting or what?

http://www.usnw.net

20Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Sun Nov 24, 2013 3:25 pm

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

Not sure actually. 6 Yay, 0 Nay, and 1 Abstain. Razz

21Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Sun Nov 24, 2013 5:53 pm

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

This is the cartographic committee, it acts differently than the Assembly. We don't need a Union majority vote.

Congrats, your proposal has passed.

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

22Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Empty Re: Proposal | Border Changes to Itzamna Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:51 pm

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

We have a 3/5 yes vote.


This measure has passed by a margin of 3 yes votes and 0 no votes, with 2 members failing to vote.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum