The United Sovereign Nations
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Withdrawn | Incorporating "Sk'uuyat" into Folland

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

I'd like to officially propose(and ask)that Folland can acquire the lands formerly known as "Sk'uuyat" into Folland borders. With Fox gone and the country back to being empty, I'd like to incorporate it into my borders so Folland can occupy more of the coastline as it normally would have back during it's colonial days.



Last edited by Michael-M on Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:41 am; edited 1 time in total

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

I agree with your reasoning. But with Euphemia already having hardly any space left, and Acadia and Folland eating up Central Euphemia, I think we should leave that space there in case anyone who plans on applying later needs a place on Euphemia.

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

Coming from the guy who just ate up a whole nation next door to me several times the size of Sk'uuyat. Razz COUGH.

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

Carl

Carl

LOL Razz but you're also about to eat a nation as twice as Jack has (Iviouxkaw Federation) Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

ForthWall

ForthWall
Member (Kuyrut)
Member (Kuyrut)

I agree if you don't touch me Neutral

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

@Carl: Nnnnope, chuck testa. Read my last news.

And I want to like Kuyrut Forth. D:

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

Daniel

Daniel

I'm slightly leaning towards the "leave it open for future members" side (especially since North American is the most popular style in SC4), but I'm fine either way. Smile

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

Lol, Mike. I think we should leave it only because it has some coastline. Future members wouldn't want a landlocked nation like Fraesia or Ivouixkaw.

Daniel

Daniel

Jack wrote:Lol, Mike. I think we should leave it only because it has some coastline. Future members wouldn't want a landlocked nation like Fraesia or Ivouixkaw.

I wouldn't know...we've had landlocked members on Althena before Razz

Plus, what about Kaskaskia? It's landlocked too, isn't it? Wink

Carl

Carl

Good Point Dan Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

Jack

Jack
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)

Althenian landlocked countries are far more realistic than a Euphemian landlocked country. There are several in Europe, but I don't believe there are any in North America.

Scotch Moen

Scotch Moen
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)

You're right there aren't any in North America.

I'm willing to give up on this. I wanted to take Squamisha instead cause cmon, tiny country. But, no. I guess I'm fine. I am pretty huge already. In fact I pondered cutting Folland in half to make another country for potential new applications.

So officially, I withdraw this.

http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

Daniel

Daniel

Yeah, I guess a landlocked country in North America would be a little unbelievable...a South American-style one would be alright in my books though, seeing as how there are two of them in real life. Razz

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum