Voting: Activity Checkpoint Act

I would like to introduce the Activity Checkpoint Act. This act would repeal Nate Saathoff's Activity Index Policy and replace it with new guidelines as shown below.

Member activity checkpoints will be held every 3 months on the first day of the month

Any member with an activity index below 0 will be downgraded, or if the said member is an observer, their membership will be revoked

On-leave members' activity indexes will be reset when they return

On-leave members will be exempt from activity checkpoints

When an activity checkpoint is completed, all remaining administrators, full members, ambassadorial members, and observer members will have their activity index reset, excluding on-leave members

No administrator can overrule, modify, or repeal this act without the approval of the international assembly, by a majority vote

---

I hope these guidelines will improve and clarify the activity index system.

This is basically what I was going to propose anyway, so I support this. However, for clarity's sake, do you think we should maintain the current point system? It is as follows.

Post: 1 Point
Topic: 3 Points
Forum Games Posts and Topics: 0 Points
CJ Update: 5 Points (this has been neglected, and needs Admins to keep up with it.)

The neglect of the CJ points is my fault, I haven't really taught the other admins how to do it.

I like the idea, but it makes me paranoid since I'm not able to point everyday.

I don't know how you admins check whether someone did a CJ-update, but if you have to search all the Showcases to check whether someone did, you could reverse the roles and have members post a link in a thread especially made to make admins aware of their new CJ-update. Then the admin needs only click the link to see whether it is indeed a valid CJ-update.

I think we should also delete members that haven't logged in for 3 months (or whatever number of months). This would help clear memory and show which members are actually active. (not member states but registered users )

Qorten wrote:I don't know how you admins check whether someone did a CJ-update, but if you have to search all the Showcases to check whether someone did, you could reverse the roles and have members post a link in a thread especially made to make admins aware of their new CJ-update. Then the admin needs only click the link to see whether it is indeed a valid CJ-update.

The original policy is that people posting CJ articles should PM an admin, but that stopped happening about a week after it was made the policy. I think that is a good idea though, if people remember to do it.

Deleting entire members just puts a frustration on them for having to re-register if they do return from being away.

Mike: First they must be downgraded. But, maybe we should extend the time needed for their account to be revoked to 6 months missing, instead of 3.

Besides, registered members have contributed to the forums (like benedictx, which provided us with the Enieo designs)

So it's better to leave it out

I think this is ready for voting.

Jon wrote:This is basically what I was going to propose anyway, so I support this. However, for clarity's sake, do you think we should maintain the current point system? It is as follows.

Post: 1 Point
Topic: 3 Points
Forum Games Posts and Topics: 0 Points
CJ Update: 5 Points (this has been neglected, and needs Admins to keep up with it.)

The neglect of the CJ points is my fault, I haven't really taught the other admins how to do it.

I could figure it out. Should I try?

Voooooted

Voted.

Voted.

Voted.

Voted

Voted. Also it apparently isn't possible.

Obviously this passed, so...

Moved and locked.