The United Sovereign Nations
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Day 3

+3
Daniel
Qorten
Carl
7 posters

I agree on (needs 5 to pass)

Day 3 Pollle104%Day 3 Pollri10 4% [ 3 ]
Day 3 Pollle107%Day 3 Pollri10 7% [ 6 ]
Day 3 Pollle107%Day 3 Pollri10 7% [ 6 ]
Day 3 Pollle109%Day 3 Pollri10 9% [ 7 ]
Day 3 Pollle107%Day 3 Pollri10 7% [ 6 ]
Day 3 Pollle106%Day 3 Pollri10 6% [ 5 ]
Day 3 Pollle109%Day 3 Pollri10 9% [ 7 ]
Day 3 Pollle104%Day 3 Pollri10 4% [ 3 ]
Day 3 Pollle1010%Day 3 Pollri10 10% [ 8 ]
Day 3 Pollle104%Day 3 Pollri10 4% [ 3 ]
Day 3 Pollle105%Day 3 Pollri10 5% [ 4 ]
Day 3 Pollle109%Day 3 Pollri10 9% [ 7 ]
Day 3 Pollle104%Day 3 Pollri10 4% [ 3 ]
Day 3 Pollle109%Day 3 Pollri10 9% [ 7 ]
Day 3 Pollle109%Day 3 Pollri10 9% [ 7 ]
Total Votes : 82

Poll closed

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Day 3 Empty Day 3 Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:11 pm

Carl

Carl

This is a package for the Military, Defense and Non-Proliferation

Package 1: Military

This package is a package that will reduce the amount of military forces and to invest money on technology for the military. Here are some of the ideas
(a1) Oppose any creation of a "Peacekeeping Force"that usually spell more trouble originally planned by Grand to the International Assembly.
(a2) Support any creation of a "Peacekeeping Force"that usually spell more help originally planned by Grand to the International Assembly.
(b) Reduce any conflicts between the USNW Nations by using diplomatic means of communication (either by PMs or by Skype), with the observation of either of the 3 Administrators of the USNW
(c) Impose Sanctions on Nations that declares combat on each other.
(d) Invest more money on the defense rather than the attack
(e) Invest in more military technologies such as UAVs, aircraft and vessels

Package 2: Defense

(a) Improve on the defense of the USNW Airspace
(b) Secure and protect defense files by establishing (Company Name)
(c) Prevent any intrusion by Adoleaks and Unknown by investing more technology to the anti-cyber crimes unit

Package 3: Non-Proliferation (applies to some USNW Nations) (optional)
(a) Ban the use of Nuclear Weapons on USNW Nations, even if it's only a test.
(b) Discourage the research for nuclear weapons
(c) Oblige to clean up your test sites (not somebody else's)
(d) Halt production of enriched uranium and plutonium for use in nuclear weapons
(e) Impose sanctions on nations threatening to use nuclear weapons
(f) Impose sanctions on nations breaking the laws in this package



Last edited by 111222333444 on Fri Jan 06, 2012 2:00 am; edited 7 times in total

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

2Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:42 am

Qorten

Qorten
Member (Ami Confederation)

Day 1 was a succes IMO, Day 2, yeah, I was not surprised by the way it turned out.

3Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:02 pm

Carl

Carl

Sometimes other people are very hard to persuade Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

4Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:41 pm

Carl

Carl

Updated*

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

5Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 7:53 pm

Guest


Guest

1

A1. New Chandler does not find an economical point in a peacekeeping force.
B. I support this.
C. I support this, if the administration does not know of it first.
D. I am neutral on this.
E. I do not support this being a union-ran research idea.

2
A. I do not support this, I think countries should fend for themselves here.
B. I do not support this.
C. I am neutral on this.

Package 3: Non-Proliferation (applies to some USNW Nations) (optional)
A. I strongly support this.
B. I strongly support this.
C. I do not support this. Why should I clean up someone else's mess?
D. I do not support this. Nuclear energy is productive in some countries.
E. I support this.
F. I support this.

6Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:02 pm

Carl

Carl

K50 - Updated*

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

7Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:07 pm

Guest


Guest

111222333444 wrote:K50 - Updated*
huh?

8Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:07 pm

Carl

Carl

K50 wrote:
111222333444 wrote:K50 - Updated*
huh?

Look above ^^

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

9Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:08 pm

Daniel

Daniel

Delegation from Grand, Belluterra, & Malo

#1a1: For obvious reasons, we do not oppose this; furthermore, we believe sufficient modifications have been made since it was originally proposed to enable it to be safely used, without fear of it being used in combat.
#1a2: We fully support it, as there is practically no chance of the United Forces being used in combat without the approval of every Union Member, allowing it to put all its energy into fufilling its planned role as a peacekeeper.
#1b: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo is currently neutral on this issue.
#1c: With the exception of extremely close allies of our nation, such as Ruteria, Utrova, Posillipo, or Ordanus, we approve of this.
#1d: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo fully approves of this.
#1e: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo fully approves of this, and we are currently developing an experimental helicopter for potential export in the future.
#2a: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo fully approves of this.
#2b: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo fully approves of this.
#2c: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo fully approves of this.
#3a: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo does not approve of this, for crucial national security reasons.
#3b: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo does not approve of this.
#3c: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo fully approves of this, and routinely engages in cleaning up all sites currently unused by the government.
#3d: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo does not currently produce weapons-grade uranium, and production of weapons-grade plutonium is on standby.
#3e: Grand, Belluterra, and Malo approves of this to a degree.
#3f: As we do not approve of all laws in this package, we will be selective in who we place sanctions on.

10Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:25 pm

alerules22

alerules22
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)

(a1) Ruteria abstains and will remain Neutral / As I only have one Vote Gamat will abstain
(a2) Ruteria abstains and will remain Neutral / As I only have one Vote Gamat will abstain
(b) Ruteria and Gamat remains Neutral in this subject
(c) Ruteria and Gamat remains negative in this subject as we think conflicts can always happen
(d) Ruteria and Gamat fully supports this
(e) Ruteria remains Neutral, But Gamat supports it

(a) Ruteria and Gamat approves this
(b) Ruteria and Gamat Remains Neutral
(c) Ruteria and Gamat supports this, but knows that is highly unlikely that they will stop, and some nations can't afford it

(a) Ruteria and Gamat remain Neutral
(b) Ruteria and Gamat opposes
(c) Ruteria and Gamat agrees
(d) Ruteria opposes, Gamat remains Neutral
(e) Ruteria and Gamat Opposes
(f) Ruteria and Gamat Approves

http://www.usnw.net

11Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:36 pm

Chip

Chip
Webmaster

Package 1: Military
This package is a package that will reduce the amount of military forces and to invest money on technology for the military. Here are some of the ideas
(a2) The Kingdom of Posillipo supports the creation of a peace keeping force..
(b) Completely agree.
(c) Completely agree, possible even tougher consequences.
(d) Neutral
(e) I believe this is the responsibility of the sovereign nations.

Package 2: Defense
(a) Joint defense operations to protect USNW airspace is not required, in my opinion. Nations can fend for themselves, and if not, most nations have an ally that will support them.
(b) Approve.
(c) Approve.

Package 3: Non-Proliferation (applies to some USNW Nations) (optional)
(a) The Kingdom of Posillipo beleives that Nuclear weapons are a key piece of our military aresanal and is required for the defense and protection of our people. We completely agree that nuclear weapons should never be used on another USNW country, however, we will continue to test our weapons on our land in Millinesia.
(b) Posillipo believes that if the nation does not already have an maintain a nuclear arsenal, then they are not a suitable host for the technology.
(c) Posillipo goes to great lengths to ensure the safety of our people and the environment when we take part in nuclear tests.
(d) Posillipo disagrees, we believe we must maintain our nuclear arsenal, that includes upgrades and safe discarding of our out of date weapons.
(e) Posillipo partially agrees, if a nation threatens to use nuclear force without due reason, the nation should be punished, however if a nation is attacked, Posillipo believes they have the right to defense.
(f) Posillipo agrees.

http://www.usnw.net

12Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:04 pm

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

Package 1: Military
(a) The Peace Keeping Force will discourage war, therefore Shayden agrees to it.
(b) Agree
(c) Agree
(d) Agree, for a good offense, you need a good defense.
(e) Agree

Package 2: Defense
(a) Agree, but only if the Nation calls for it
(b) Neutral
(c) Agree

Package 3: Non-Proliferation (applies to some USNW Nations) (optional)
(a) Do not ban, but discourage their use unless of desperate measures.
(b) Nations that will responsibly use nukes should be able to have them.
(c) Agree
(d) Disagree
(e) Agree
(f) Agree

13Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Fri Jan 06, 2012 2:08 am

Carl

Carl

Poll is up, so get voting! Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

14Day 3 Empty Re: Day 3 Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:47 am

androidboi

androidboi

Package 1: Military
(a2) Support any creation of a Peacekeeping Force
(b) Agree
(c) Agree
(d) Abstain
(e) Abstain

New Friscia fails to see any blatant action regarding the reduction of military personnel and/or capability of member states as proposed by this package.

Package 2: Defense
(a) Agree
(b) Abstain
(c) Agree

Package 3: Non-Proliferation
(a) Agree
(b) Agree
(c) Agree
(d) Agree
(e) Agree
(f) Agree

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum