Procedures

As established in the passed "Creation of a NPC committee" bill.


-Members;

The Non-Player Countries Committee will be composed of five (5) members. There will be one (1) member representing a region of Adonia. As such, each member will have a veto power over his region, meaning that he can temporarily freeze a voting process over a NPC Committee bill, forcing a debate until consensus or majority vote. Members of this committee will not be chosen automatically by the region they have a nation in the union, but rather on personal out-of-character knowledge and expertise, which means that ideally each region will have a member in the region representing it, but it is not necessary.

Current members:

- Itzamna (Agus)
- Euphemia (Kurt)
- Western Althena (Juls)
- Eastern Althena (Carl)
- Neridea and Carreon (Willem)

-Powers;
The NPC Committee will hold the following powers over NPCs:

- Decide upon coat of arms and flag design;
- Decide upon economics;
- Decide upon political system;
- Decide upon culture and languages;
- Decide upon basic society and demographics;
- Decide upon naming in general (i.e. nation name, leaders, cities);
- Voting ability, and veto capability.

-Obligations;
The NPC Committee will hold and must complete the following obligations:

- Provide basic information and statistics for each NPC;
(Through proper wiki infobox and basic information)

-Voting Procedure;
Members will fulfill their obligations for their respective region while remaining completely transparent with the rest of the NPC Committee. After a NPC is completed, if there is a minimum of one (1) objection, the NPC will be put to vote by the Committee. If there is no objection, the NPC will be automatically approved and presented to the rest of the union.

If a member completely disagrees on the matter, he can veto the voting procedure, which would be freezed for debate.

In case of a veto, members will be forced to freeze the vote and debate for a period of minimum one day, whereas each member will have to express their opinion. Following this period of time, a vote will be held and a simple majority will settle the question.

In case of proposed NPC by a USNW member not part of the NPC Committee, the same voting system will apply on that NPC as a NPC from a Committee member.

I dislike that, that is basically saying that NPCs are for NPC committee members only, NPCs are for all of us to take part in. This makes it too closed to the committee and not open to all of us. The only thing members should do in the committee is approve and manage standard members work on NPCs. the point of the committee was not to do all the work, (yes I know you are not stopping us from working on them you are just shutting us off)

I'd have to agree with Agunter.

Agunter999 wrote:I dislike that, that is basically saying that NPCs are for NPC committee members only, NPCs are for all of us to take part in. This makes it too closed to the committee and not open to all of us. The only thing members should do in the committee is approve and manage standard members work on NPCs. the point of the committee was not to do all the work, (yes I know you are not stopping us from working on them you are just shutting us off)

The rules were accepted this way. If you want to change them, you'll have to do it through a vote in the chamber. This does not stop any member from working on NPCs, it actually does exactly what you want it to do, approve. If you create an NPC, it must be approved by the committee. If an NPC Committee member creates an NPC, it must be approved by the Committee, as shown in the procedures above. That's all it means. Anyone can work on NPCs, and everyone is encouraged to do so. This Committee regulates it all, that's all.

Good to see people reading properly.

Youhat may be the case in your eyes but the way that is written does not give the impression you think it does

What is Youhat?

I don't see any problems, as we would actually want everyone to approve, not like members putting random stuff and then making a lean that is advantageous to the country that controlled that NPC. That is a parasitical relationship.

I'm good now

Agunter999 wrote:Youhat may be the case in your eyes but the way that is written does not give the impression you think it does

Final line of the procedures is pretty clear imo, but glad we cleared the misunderstanding

Well in my opinion I'm good as long if members can apply an npc eventhough you need to do an proporsal.

I agree with this system and see no problem either.

System is fine imo, I don't see any problem either.