Saathoff for Chancellor

Post these in your signature to support Saathoff for Chancellor!


http://www.majhost.com/gallery/saathoff/Campaign/campaignsignature2.png


http://www.majhost.com/gallery/saathoff/Campaign/campaignsignature.png

I support thoroughly ^_^

I support, too!

the race is very tight D:

Nate you can't run for more than one cabinet position. You have to choose one of the three.

K50 wrote:Nate you can't run for more than one cabinet position. You have to choose one of the three.

Can I see the exact language of where I can not do this? If it was a problem I believe an admin would of told me during Skype.

I don't think I have to say who I'm supporting Everything looks great Nate bring on the engine!

Nate, you cannot monopolize the cabinet. Plain and simple. This rule has been very clearly stated in the past for the January 2012 elections and the July 2011 elections, and was followed during the elections when we started this union in January/Feburary of 2011, over Skype. Perhaps you are thinking of ministries which you can run for more than one?

I know you don't mean any hard feelings but I'm kind of offended you think you can take over all three of the executive cabinet positions. There are a lot of users here who have great potential and the incumbents have done great work at their posts. I'm not saying you aren't any better or worse, you have led unions to great places, but it sounds a bit harsh and very power-hungry that you think you can lead this union effectively on your own without any help from other executives.

Ahh classic example of try to take down your rivals throw them in a lime light. Good job . I'll take your word for it though. Bring on the elections K50! No more playing nice guy with you...


Also being a candidate for all 3 doesn't mean you want all 3 for once. It just means you want one of the positions and are leaving it up to the members which they feel is the best position for you. But like I said I get you. You're trying to take me down. You certainly have to. It's whats always done in political elections. But very well my friend.

Nate I'm not trying to throwing you down in time for elections. I'm stating my opinion and clarifying a point....

By throwing me down. I suggest you stop posting in my campaign. I'm sure the members don't like whats going on. Focus on yourself, and quite worrying about what others are doing for their campaign.

Nate meant he is running for all three saying if he won Chancellor and First Minister he would then be Chancellor and the runner up would be First Minister. He isn't trying to get all three positions at once I don't believe. I'm assuming Nate would take the highest position he won.

Yeah. I'm not sure why one would think they can get all 3 positions to themselves. I'm saying hey members! If you wish you can vote for me for the other positions. Be it I'm on the ballot or it's write-In. I don't find that power hungry at all, I find it that I'm letting the members decide where they feel I best fit.

But carry on K50, carry on..

Actually it does sound like a good idea to me. But this thread isn't the place for it.

New amendment?

Thanks Jack for relaxing the mood in here. Props to you

Locked. Polling station opening soon.