The United Sovereign Nations
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Accepted: Full Membership | Commonwealth of Paradise

+3
Chip
Will
kj34
7 posters

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Should Paradise be promoted to Full Membership? (needs 5 votes)

Accepted: Full Membership | Commonwealth of Paradise Pollle10100%Accepted: Full Membership | Commonwealth of Paradise Pollri10 100% [ 9 ]
Accepted: Full Membership | Commonwealth of Paradise Pollle100%Accepted: Full Membership | Commonwealth of Paradise Pollri10 0% [ 0 ]
Accepted: Full Membership | Commonwealth of Paradise Pollle100%Accepted: Full Membership | Commonwealth of Paradise Pollri10 0% [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 9

Poll closed

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

kj34

kj34
Member (Paradise)
Member (Paradise)

Well if you need my info let me know but, really guys, I should have done this ages ago

Edit: I direct your attention to this link
http://www.usnw.net/t133-accepted-full-member-commonwealth-of-paradise

Apparently I am a full member so just ignore this Razz

Will

Will
Member (GSK)

I'd vote no Razz jk, I can't vote for one, and two, why would I vote no really? Razz I think you were booted to ambassadorial though due to inactivity. I may be wrong though.

kj34

kj34
Member (Paradise)
Member (Paradise)

You know that was probably it.... Well I'll see what Jon and Chip say.

Guest


Guest

If you post your CJ updates on here (if there's something we love, it's big CJ updates, and you are good in that area) from here on out I have no problems with it. Smile

Chip

Chip
Webmaster

I don't have a problem with it, however you were booted and then readmitted, so you technically need to apply...

http://www.usnw.net

Guest


Guest

Chip wrote:I don't have a problem with it, however you were booted and then readmitted, so you technically need to apply...
Neutral

Carl

Carl

Wut? Neutral

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

Daniel

Daniel

Unfortunately, Chip is correct, as Kenny did miss a few checkpoints Crying

I'd vote yes for a reinstatement of his full membership without a second thought though Very Happy

Guest


Guest

I disagree. Typically if you had union experience anyway, not counting UCOM, you got accepted as a full member. Look at Matt for example.

Either way, he is going to be a full member anyway Razz I don't care, I just want to get things done.

Fox



I agree with Chip .. it was unfortunate he was "demoted" but if a valid reason wasn't given or prior notice of the prolonged absence, then I believe it fair to have him reapply .. just like a drivers licence... you forget to renew your license, you need to sit the test again.

Obviously he'll get accepted, but the formalities or rules shouldn't be bent in any circumstance. That's one thing I don't like around here.

That being said ... I'd yes for sure.

Guest


Guest

I'm saying yes! Smile

Kurt

Kurt
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)

K50 wrote:I disagree. Typically if you had union experience anyway, not counting UCOM, you got accepted as a full member. Look at Matt for example.

Either way, he is going to be a full member anyway Razz I don't care, I just want to get things done.

I had union experience with AFDES and AIN, but I wasn't accepted as full member at first.

I'll vote a yes at this.

Daniel

Daniel

Kurt wrote:
K50 wrote:I disagree. Typically if you had union experience anyway, not counting UCOM, you got accepted as a full member. Look at Matt for example.

Either way, he is going to be a full member anyway Razz I don't care, I just want to get things done.

I had union experience with AFDES and AIN, but I wasn't accepted as full member at first.

On the other hand, I had no union experience at all, and I was accepted as a full member immediately for some reason Razz

Guest


Guest

Daniel wrote:
Kurt wrote:
K50 wrote:I disagree. Typically if you had union experience anyway, not counting UCOM, you got accepted as a full member. Look at Matt for example.

Either way, he is going to be a full member anyway Razz I don't care, I just want to get things done.

I had union experience with AFDES and AIN, but I wasn't accepted as full member at first.

On the other hand, I had no union experience at all, and I was accepted as a full member immediately for some reason Razz
Because you were the first applicant and we were desperate to get one Razz

I'm going to open voting. A reminder that you have to be a full member to vote on full member applications. I've voted YES.

Guest


Guest

voted

Daniel

Daniel

Voted Very Happy

kj34

kj34
Member (Paradise)
Member (Paradise)

Looks like it's a wrap Razz

Carl

Carl

Wait, who voted the other ones? Neutral

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

Guest


Guest

It doesn't really matter Smile

Congrats Kenny you're a full member now!

Chip

Chip
Webmaster

Actually K50, weren't you the one that proposed and passed that ammendment that made it required for full members to reapply, you start out as ambassadorial then reapply for Full Membership.

Also, did you turn off the ambassadorial voting? Only full members can vote on full member applications.

http://www.usnw.net

Guest


Guest

Chip wrote:Also, did you turn off the ambassadorial voting? Only full members can vote on full member applications.
Yes I did.....

Actually K50, weren't you the one that proposed and passed that ammendment that made it required for full members to reapply, you start out as ambassadorial then reapply for Full Membership.
Didn't pass. Didn't matter Smile

Fox



Congratulations on becoming a Full Member .. again ..lol

Chip

Chip
Webmaster

Congrats. Smile

http://www.usnw.net

kj34

kj34
Member (Paradise)
Member (Paradise)

I know this is a little impatient of me, but could we change that title under my flag? Razz

Carl

Carl

LOL You're still an ambassador Razz

http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum