The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1 Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:53 am

alerules22

avatar
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
First of all, the Xteplaan Sea, at is current state is full of flaws and quite a bit of nonsense;

Therefore I propose some changes be made to it, immediately.

We can start with Acadia's dependencies.


Acadia currently has 3 dependencies in the Xteplaa, to which in my opinion; and the opinion of other members, is completely unrealistic.

This dependencies include:

Chanto Ellia, San José, Selgeta, and Lucido Turquesa.

I propose the following


  • Remove all of Acadia's dependencies in the Xteplaa as they serve of no historical, realistic or economical function to Acadia.
  • Divide Chanto Ellia into 2 sovereign islands; being the Republic of Chanto, and the Republic of Ellia.
  • Give sovereignty to the Republic of San José.
  • Give sovereignty to the Republic of Selgeta.
  • Divide Lucido Turquesa into 2 sovereign islands; forming part of the Trentannia's Commonwealth. The Commonwealth of Lucido and the Commonwealth of Turquesa


Muerzuela


I have already spoken to Kurt about the status of Muerzuela, and we agreed to leave Muerzuela as an Unincorporated Territory of Shayden.

Insulo's dependencies


I have no greater problem with such dependencies, as they served as historical entryways for Insulo into the Itzamna.

New Panutra


It shall become an Overseas Territory of Etrusque.

That is all I have to say at the moment



Last edited by alerules22 on Sun Apr 27, 2014 12:19 pm; edited 1 time in total

View user profile http://www.usnw.net

2 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:55 am

Juls

avatar
Member (Sinope)
Member (Sinope)
Change the name of Panutra (as it doesn't sound Etruscan at all, though you can do that later in the NPC Committee) and I support Wink

View user profile

3 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 12:00 pm

I'm fine with it.

View user profile http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

4 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 12:08 pm

Kurt

avatar
Admin (Shayden)
Admin (Shayden)
If Jack was on I would ask him about the Acadian changes, but I agree with the rest.

View user profile

5 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 1:39 pm

Qorten

avatar
Member (Ami Confederation)
- I wouldn't touch Acadia's dependencies until Jack's had a say in it, but if he agreed to drop them
  - I'd think the island of Selgeta would end up with the Ortizan Islands nation
  - I'm okay with other proposals for Jack's dependencies, if, as said above, he agrees to drop them

- I would add the island nation of Antonia to either the New Panutra dependency or the Ortizan Islands
- I am okay with the proposal for Muerzuela
- I am okay with the proposal for Insulo's dependencies

View user profile

6 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:51 pm

Willem

avatar
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)
I feel like Bruellen's colonial presence is forgotten.

I'm okay with these changes.

View user profile

7 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:54 pm

SimEmirate

avatar
Member (Abbasid and Kwangju)
Member (Abbasid and Kwangju)
Qorten wrote:- I wouldn't touch Acadia's dependencies until Jack's had a say in it, but if he agreed to drop them
    - I'd think the island of Selgeta would end up with the Ortizan Islands nation
    - I'm okay with other proposals for Jack's dependencies, if, as said above, he agrees to drop them

- I would add the island nation of Antonia to either the New Panutra dependency or the Ortizan Islands
- I am okay with the proposal for Muerzuela
- I am okay with the proposal for Insulo's dependencies


I second this. Razz

View user profile

8 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:14 pm

alerules22

avatar
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
I think Selgeta and Antonia should be completely independent, as it would emphasize the failure of the colonial powers in the area, as well as create much more potential for roleplay and history.

The Ortizan islands are already too big for a Xteplaan nation.

View user profile http://www.usnw.net

9 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:54 pm

Qorten

avatar
Member (Ami Confederation)
It's all for the Cartographic and NPC Committee to decide anyway. I want my amendments to your proposal to be given a chance. And whatever happens, I'd wait for Jack's opinion. You don't want to anger a long time member and the guy who does most of the map work.

View user profile

10 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 10:40 pm

Juls

avatar
Member (Sinope)
Member (Sinope)
Thing is, Jack probably doesn't even know he has those territories in the first place lol

View user profile

11 Re: Proposal | Reformation of the Xteplaa on Sun Apr 27, 2014 11:49 pm

Willem

avatar
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)
I'm pretty sure Jack won't mind this kind of thing. Razz

View user profile

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum