The United Sovereign Nations


You are not connected. Please login or register

Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic.

Go to page : 1, 2  Next

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 2]

1 Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:37 pm

alerules22

avatar
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)



Last edited by alerules22 on Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:07 am; edited 1 time in total

View user profile http://www.usnw.net

2 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:47 pm

Juls

avatar
Member (Sinope)
Member (Sinope)
Well done m8

View user profile

3 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:55 pm

So detailed... Loved it Razz

View user profile http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

4 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:58 pm

Scotch Moen

avatar
Member (Folland)
Member (Folland)
As some of these have legitimate basis, the Government of Folland objects to most of these as reckless speculation and biased assumptions. The Military intervention carried out into Fraesia was with orders not to use lethal or damaging force. The case with the Fraesian International Airport was to use it as a base of supply. The civilians that were at the moment inside during the capture were not taken hostage, and in fact released shortly after to return to their homes. At most, this is an occupation, not an Invasion or attack.

Because of this, the Follandan Government accuses the Foreign Minister and the Government of Fraesia with falsifying evidence and request the case be thrown out.

View user profile http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

5 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:07 am

Willem

avatar
Member (Bruellen)
Member (Bruellen)
Good stuff, Agus. Razz

View user profile

6 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:53 pm

Jack

avatar
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Member (Acadia & Valessia)
Mike, how do you think the international community would react if:
  • The United States sent their military into a peaceful, defenseless country, like Haiti, yesterday morning.  
  • The US didn't need to kill anyone because the country is too weak to defend itself.  
  • The US took over an airport with civilians inside it.  
  • The US created a no-fly zone, severely disrupting the economy.  
  • The US told people to not resist and stay home while their country was being occupied.  
  • The US refused to care about the thousands of civilians that fled to the Dominican Republic, and other places.
  • The US refused to leave after many nations demanded it to.  
  • The US then used intimidation to try to gain classified documents.  
  • All while the US claimed that there was some sort of unavoidable war that no one else knew the US was talking about and everyone thought we went insane.


  • It would be catastrophic.  And the US would use common sense and pull out of Haiti.

    I must also remind you that this is a clear breach of international law.  Folland has intervened in Fraesia's internal affairs, as simple as that, and they refuse to stop.


    _________________
    "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
    View user profile

    7 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 10, 2013 6:27 pm

    Scotch Moen

    avatar
    Member (Folland)
    Member (Folland)
    It's a little overkill to compare that. I'm no America and Fraesia's no Haiti. Besides you make it sounds like I'm doing something that's harming the community. I'm striking Roleplay and even Gus said this was great.

    By the way I took over the Airport for the sake of the Airport. The people inside were released to their homes, and NOT kept as hostages as many would prefer to believe.

    View user profile http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

    8 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:19 pm

    Ain't this like the ummm...

    This One Razz

    View user profile http://oktimes.canadian-forum.com

    9 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:27 pm

    Willem

    avatar
    Member (Bruellen)
    Member (Bruellen)
    lol Carl xD

    And Mike, I too think this is great roleplay, Jack is getting too attached to Fraesia and such. Razz

    View user profile

    10 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:48 pm

    alerules22

    avatar
    Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
    Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
    The Republic of Fraesia formally requests to amend it's case, with the addition of the illegal murder of a Fraesian citizen and soldier by the Follandan Air Force. Such is against international law, and especially International Charters and the Charter of the USNW. As such, Folland is in breach of their obligations and under general customary law for the murder of a Fraesian citizen.

    View user profile http://www.usnw.net

    11 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:50 pm

    Jack

    avatar
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Can I nominate Jon to be judge? He seems to be one of the few left who haven't taken a side or presented any opinion.


    _________________
    "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
    View user profile

    12 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Sat Oct 12, 2013 10:29 pm

    Jon

    avatar
    First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
    First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
    I'll be the Judge then I suppose. Razz

    View user profile

    13 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Sun Oct 13, 2013 12:36 am

    alerules22

    avatar
    Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
    Member (Oxacmela & Balisca)
    YAY WE HAVE A JUDGE!

    View user profile http://www.usnw.net

    14 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Tue Oct 15, 2013 4:15 am

    Scotch Moen

    avatar
    Member (Folland)
    Member (Folland)
    soooo....court? Razz

    View user profile http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

    15 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:51 pm

    Jack

    avatar
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Jon is asleep. Sleep


    _________________
    "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
    View user profile

    16 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:13 pm

    Jack

    avatar
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Jon, we need our judge. Razz


    _________________
    "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
    View user profile

    17 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:38 pm

    Jack

    avatar
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Sorry for bumping this again, but Agus's effort is being put to waste here. Neutral If Jon cannot be judge, maybe Daniel can.


    _________________
    "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
    View user profile

    18 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:37 am

    Scotch Moen

    avatar
    Member (Folland)
    Member (Folland)
    If a judge cannot be procured in time for this court, then the defense requests a mistrial, and the case dismissed.

    View user profile http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

    19 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:36 am

    Jon

    avatar
    First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
    First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
    My apologies, I can be judge.

    I'll get on tomorrow afternoon after I'm done with my classes and some errands I need to run, I can get this rolling then.

    View user profile

    20 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Fri Oct 18, 2013 1:47 pm

    Jon

    avatar
    First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
    First Minister (Kaskaskia & Insulo)
    As the Judge appointed by the court to preside over this trial, I declare this case officially open.

    The court requests the memorial from the plaintiffs.



    Last edited by Jon on Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:29 pm; edited 1 time in total

    View user profile

    21 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:23 pm

    Jack

    avatar
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Thank you Jon. Very Happy We can finally get started. Now we need Agus. D:


    _________________
    "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
    View user profile

    22 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:41 pm

    Scotch Moen

    avatar
    Member (Folland)
    Member (Folland)
    Defense taps their fingers on their desk to pass the time..

    View user profile http://www.dehyan.deviantart.com

    23 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 24, 2013 3:59 pm

    Chris

    avatar
    Member (Mitron)
    Member (Mitron)
    *Bump*

    View user profile

    24 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 24, 2013 4:59 pm

    kj34

    avatar
    Member (Paradise)
    Member (Paradise)
    This is taking quite some time to get started. Isn't there some time limit for how long a case can sit?

    View user profile

    25 Re: Fraesia et al. v. The Follandan Republic. on Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:07 pm

    Jack

    avatar
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Member (Acadia & Valessia)
    Jon and Agus! Razz


    _________________
    "My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  —John F. Kennedy
    View user profile

    Sponsored content


    Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 2]

    Go to page : 1, 2  Next

    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum